The non-discriminatory standardisation of products and terms of supply, which is not exclusionary, may be permissible.\u00a0\u00a0 Certification and labelling may be permissible, provided that the standards are objective, reasonable and non-discriminatory.<\/p>\n
Handbooks, codes of conduct and rules may potentially contain anti-competitive provisions.\u00a0 They are potentially rendered void as anti-competitive and\/or an abuse of dominant position.<\/p>\n
The division of markets by trading association is likely to constitute an anti-competitive practice.<\/p>\n
The misuse of collective power, including a boycott or limitation applied to dealings with third parties, is likely to be anti-competitive.<\/p>\n
Joint advertising campaigns may be permissible, provided that they do not involve pricing. Rules and codes which prohibit and restrict advertising will generally be anti-competitive.<\/p>\n
It may be legitimate to put restrictions on the terms and content of advertisements.\u00a0 The Competition Authority has taken to view that advertising and price competition is necessary and desirable in the public interest.<\/p>\n
Requirements that advertisements must not be misleading, untruthful or likely to bring a profession into dispute will normally be acceptable.\u00a0 Certain types of selling and unsolicited contact calling may be prohibited by the rules.<\/p>\n
Trade fairs are permissible in principle.\u00a0 In principle, they should be open wide. Space limitations may justify a limit on numbers.\u00a0 Exclusionary and discriminatory arrangements are likely to be anti-competitive.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Market Sharing Cartels and market-sharing arrangements constitute one of the most serious breaches of competition law.\u00a0 Cartels may involve blatant and explicit conspiracies to set prices or share markets. More commonly, cartels operate informally, and of their nature, they are undocumented. They may be difficult to prove. Cartels typically operate in markets with relatively few […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[159],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10028"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10028"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20530,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10028\/revisions\/20530"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}