The Beddy report rejected CIE’s proposals to restrict private operators of commercial vehicles to divert sufficient traffic to the railways.\u00a0 It concluded that that restriction of freedom was unjustified. It also rejects subsidisation and force feeding of traffic on railways. It recommended that railways operated under realistic conditions which meant accepting the reality of low-density transport needs and the emergence of road traffic as a more suitable alternative in many cases.<\/p>\n
Although the report seemed to argue in favour of the abandonment of the railways, it \u00a0ultimately came down in favour of radical changes and retention of key lines.\u00a0 It concluded that if the length of lines and number of stations were more closely related to the volume of suitable traffic, it might have been possible to demonstrate it could operate economically in providing safe, speedy organised and disciplined methods of transport. \u00a0Railways had retained a significant \u00a0share of goods freight and this assisted help their retention.<\/p>\n
The report was published in May 1957 and recommended closing one thousand miles of lines at 150 railway stations. The map of railway lineage it proposed of approx. 850 kilometres largely resembles the present mainline railway connections between Dublin to Wexford, Waterford, Cork, Tralee Limerick, Galway, Westport Ballina \u00a0and Sligo.<\/p>\n
It recommended closure of the \u00a0second line to Limerick via Nenagh, but it was retained,\u00a0 It \u00a0recommended examination of the Limerick to Sligo line between Tuam and Claremorris. This was retained in part and partly reopened in the 2000s.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nationalisation of CIE The Transport Act, 1950 nationalised CIE. It saw the government buying out the debenture stockholders at par by giving them three percent transport stock for the holdings. CIE would be liable in interest on the new transport stock and could borrow from the government if funds were inadequate. The ordinary shares were […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[104],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11379"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11379"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11379\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11383,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11379\/revisions\/11383"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}