Damage by water is governed by principles of negligence, nuisance, and so-called Rylands v Fletcher \u201cstrict\u201d liability.\u00a0 The escape of water \u00a0which is naturally on land, \u00a0or stored or gathered naturally does not make the owner or occupier liable.<\/p>\n
If however the accumulation is unnatural, strict liability will arise. Therefore, if water, artificially accumulated escapes, strict liability will follow. This principle does not apply to water systems within buildings.\u00a0 Ordinary principles of negligence apply.<\/p>\n
If the escape arises in circumstances constituting a nuisance or negligence, the owner or occupier will be thereby liable. It may be nuisance if water escapes from the eaves or gutters of an adjoining land onto another’s, thereby causing damage to another’s property.\u00a0 However, a right to so do may be acquired as an easement by long-use or grant.<\/p>\n
If a person diverts a natural stream, he is liable for damage caused where water escapes or overflows through inadequate construction. Where statutory bodies have powers to do work that which is necessarily caused by the works themselves is immune from action unless it is done negligently.<\/p>\n
The owner of a bed of a natural river or an artificial channel is not liable at common law for damages done by water where it overflows because of gradual or natural silting.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Property in Water Water which is appropriated or taken in to possession from a known channel, is capable of being owned.\u00a0 The property right exists only during possession. Blocked water within a receptacle is the property of the person who possesses it for as long as he continues in possession. Where water flows through his […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[267],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11983"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11983"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11983\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32745,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11983\/revisions\/32745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}