attempts to engage in the same, or makes any threat to engage in terrorist activity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nIt is an offence if a person commits outside the State an act, which if committed in the State, would constitute certain offences under The Offences against the State Act.<\/p>\n
Acts committed on \u00a0\u00a0Irish ships, or aircraft, by a person who is either a citizen or resident in the State, or committed for the benefit of a legal person established in the State, directed against the State or an Irish citizen, or \u00a0directed at European Union or its institutions, is subject to the above provisions. The provisions apply to acts committed outside the State other than that in the above circumstances, but the DPP must a consent to the proceedings.<\/p>\n
The prohibition does not apply to the activities of Armed Forces during an armed conflict insofar as they are governed by international humanitarian law, the exercise of the Armed Forces of a State in the exercise of their official duties insofar as they are governed by international law.<\/p>\n
The fact that a person engages in any protest, advocacy or dissent, or engages in any strike, lockout or other industrial action, is not of itself a sufficient basis for inferring that the person is carrying out an act with the intention of\u00a0 intimidating population or unduly compelling State or other international organisations.<\/p>\n
In the case of offences committed outside the State with the intention of unduly compelling the government of the State other than an EU State to perform or abstain from performing an act or seriously destabilising the fundamental, political, constitutional, economic or social structures of such a State, then, no proceedings \u00a0may be taken without the consent of the Attorney General.<\/p>\n
<\/span>Presumption<\/span><\/h3>\nWhere it is proved the accused person attempted or committed an act that constitutes an offence in Schedule 2 to the Act, or would do if it was committed in the State,\u00a0 and the court is satisfied, having regard to all the circumstances including those below, that it is reasonable to assume that the act was committed, or the attempt was made, with the intention of seriously intimidating a population, or unduly compelling a government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing an act, or undermining, destabilising or destroying the fundamental, political, constitutional, economic and social structures of a State or special organisation, the accused person shall be presumed, unless the court is satisfied to the contrary, to have committed or attempted to commit the act with that intention.<\/p>\n
The requisite circumstances are:<\/p>\n
\n- whether the act or attempt created or was likely to create a collective danger to the lives or physical integrity of persons,<\/li>\n
- cause or was likely to cause serious damage to a State or international organisation;<\/li>\n
- cause or was likely to cause major economic loss, or other circumstances, the court considers relevant.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n