The constitutional right to earn a livelihood has been recognised as potentially capable of being asserted against third party.\u00a0 However, it is not absolute and may be restricted in the common good.\u00a0 The restriction must be proportionate to the objective.<\/p>\n
Right of freedom of association are also protected by the Constitution.\u00a0 It may similarly be restricted in the public good.<\/p>\n
Requirements for due natural justice and constitutional justice apply with greater force in the case of forfeiture, expulsion or suspension.\u00a0 It has been argued that suspension may of itself constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade.<\/p>\n
The courts will require procedural fairness before important rights such as the \u00a0right to earn a livelihood may be limited or restrained.<\/p>\n
Provided there is due process and the rules are for a legitimate purpose, suspensions are likely to be justifiable under the restraint of trade doctrine, provided they are proportionate.<\/p>\n
Caps on earning in the Northern Ireland League were held to be invalid as an unjustifiable restraint of trade.\u00a0 In Eastham v.\u00a0 Newcastle United Football Club, a league rule by which a club could \u00a0restrain a player from transferring on, was held to be in restraint of trade.\u00a0 There was no objective justification.<\/p>\n
Where an alternative league was sought to be established in cricket, the international cricket governing body and the English Test and County Cricket Board sought to disqualify \u00a0players playing in unauthorised matches.\u00a0 The restraints imposed on reason of playing in a rival test series, endangered livelihood of the cricketers concerned and the restraint of trade could not be justified.\u00a0 It applied to Test and County Cricket.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Sports Organisation Rules Sports organisations are governed by the rules and codes.\u00a0 There may be general beyond the rules of the game.\u00a0 The organisation, clubs, representative organisations and governing bodies, are governed by rules. Governing bodies may themselves be liable for their own negligence or for negligence of persons for whom they are vicariously liable.\u00a0\u00a0The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[185],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22190"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22190"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22190\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35949,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22190\/revisions\/35949"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}