The 2008 Act defines \u2018authorised undertaking\u2019. where a person is present in the State, authorisation for interception has been given but the messages cannot be directly intercepted in the State and the authorised undertaking is obliged to facilitate interception and can in this instance facilitate interception by accessing equipment in a member state, the authorised undertaking shall facilitate the interception.<\/p>\n
Where the person concerned is present in a member state, a lawful warrant or order for interception has been made for the purposes of a criminal investigation but the messages cannot be directly intercepted in the member state and an authorised undertaking in this State is obliged to facilitate interception and can in this instance directly intercept and has equipment that can enable a telecommunications provider in the member state to intercept, then the authorised undertaking shall facilitate the interception of the messages.<\/p>\n
The 2008 Act amends the Postal and Telecommunications Services Act, 1983 by the insertion of a provision for fines for noncompliance. Authorised undertakings who are obliged to comply with requests to facilitate interception and who do not do so, without reasonable excuse, will be subject to a fine of \u20ac5,000 on summary conviction and an unlimited fine on indictment.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Interception of Communications Articles 17 to 22 of the 2000 Convention make provision for the interception of telecommunications. The 2008 Act contains definitions of certain terms used in this Part.\u00a0The following deals with interception of telecommunications where technical assistance is required from a member state. Request to member state for interception The 2008 Act sets […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[378],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27839"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27839"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27839\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30356,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27839\/revisions\/30356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}