The question discoverability under the Statute of Limitations Act Amendment Act 1991 was an issue in some of the earlier cases arising from the sexual abuse of minors. \u00a0The courts in a number of cases were prepared to take a sympathetic view to claimants and to accept that they were not aware of the significance of certain psychiatric and psychological injuries attributable to the sexual assault and delay in the receipt of the help of experts and advice.<\/p>\n
The Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act 2000 extended the limitation period in relation to sexual abuse cases.\u00a0 Where a claimant had been sexually abused when he or she was a minor but had ceased to be under a disability for a period in excess of the Statute of Limitations the claimant had one additional year after the passing of the Act in which to initiate proceedings.<\/p>\n
The claimant must either have obtained legal advice, which caused him to believe that an action could not be brought or must have complained to Garda S\u00edoch\u00e1na about the abuse prior to that date. For the purpose of bringing an action in relation to sex abuse where the person was a minor, a person was deemed under a disability while he is suffering from a psychological injury that was caused in whole or in part by that act or other act of the person who committed that act which was of such significance that his will or his ability to make a reasoned decision to bring action was substantially impaired.<\/p>\n
That Act confirms the general power of the courts to dismiss an action on the basis of long delay where the interests of justice warrant dismissal. The claim of unfair prejudice has been made in civil claims based on historical abuse, often many decades before. \u00a0Where the delay has been inexcusable and inordinate such as very many decades, the court may exercise its discretion, to dismiss the claim on account of the prejudice to the defendant\u2019s\u00a0right to a fair trial of the matter.<\/p>\n
In cases of deliberate and serious abuse, the courts have not been generally regarded that the taking of proceedings after a prolonged delay, as fundamentally unfair in itself.<\/p>\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
General Position The time limit for commencement of a claim based on breach of contract is six years.\u00a0 The time limit for civil wrong\/torts other than personal injuries and defamation is six years. Recent legislation has provided special time limits for personal injuries claims arising from negligence, namely two years, and for defamation, one year.\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":341,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[313],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2832"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/341"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2832"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2832\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}