A document, duly authenticated and purporting to be a copy of a judgment given in a court of a state bound by the Convention, shall be deemed to be a true copy of the judgment, unless the contrary is shown.<\/p>\n
There is a provision which deals with the granting by the High Court of provisional including protective measures. Most commonly such measures would be in the form of an injunction to restrain a defendant from transferring assets out of the jurisdiction so that they would be available to satisfy any resulting judgment of the court seised of the substantive proceedings.<\/p>\n
Domicile is the connecting factor used in the Convention to link a person with a state for the purposes of grounding jurisdiction and, for this purpose, is treated as being equivalent to ordinary residence. (Article 60 of the Convention deals with the domicile of legal persons and, in tandem with paragraph (c) of this section, with the domicile of a trust).<\/p>\n
The Act sets out the venue at which certain Convention proceedings may be brought insofar as the Circuit and District Courts are concerned. Certain Articles of the Convention, for example Article 2 and Article 9(1)(a), give a general jurisdiction to the courts of the State where the defendant is domiciled, and provide that jurisdiction of the Circuit Court in this context will be determined by reference to the place where the defendant or one of the defendants ordinarily resides or carries out any profession, business or occupation.<\/p>\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Judgments Act 2012 The purpose of the Jurisdiction of Courts and Enforcement of Judgments Act 2012 A to give effect to the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters signed at Lugano on 30 October 2007. This Convention supersedes the 1988 Convention of the same name which […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[153,154],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28354"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28354"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28354\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29322,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28354\/revisions\/29322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}