There is a higher probability of a legitimate expectation being established where a personal assurance or promise has been given which does not circumscribe legal powers.\u00a0 The alleged policy or basis must have been clearly shown to be communicated to the person concerned.<\/p>\n
It is more likely that the right to a fair hearing or procedural right will be held to b reqquied than that a substantial benefit is required.\u00a0In some casez, however, a change of policy would be so unfair as to amount to an abuse of power.\u00a0 In this case, the Court may hold it to be\u00a0 void.<\/p>\n
Where a lawful promise induces a legitimate expectation of a benefit as opposed to the benefit of a procedure, the Court may decide that the frustration of the expectation is so unfair that to take a different course would amount to an abuse of power. \u00a0The courts balance the interests of the member concerned and the decision maker.<\/p>\n
Administrative circulars may create legitimate expectation.\u00a0 The Revenue Commissioners may grant advance rulings or give statutory concessions. \u00a0The Revenue Commissioners now publish many of their practices in their tax briefing notes. \u00a0Questions will arise as to how specifically details of the prior ruling was.\u00a0 Generally may not make any difference.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Compensation and the State On an application for judicial review of an administrative decision, a claim for compensation may be made. \u00a0If the applicant would have succeeded in a civil claim against the authority, damages may be awarded.\u00a0 Proceedings for compensation can be brought separately in some cases. The State does not enjoy general immunity […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[130],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4820"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4820"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4820\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}