The most common forms certificates are those certifying works that have been done and the payments due.\u00a0 Architects will issue interim certificates under most employment contracts at fixed intervals.<\/p>\n
The valuation of the interim certificate is often based on the quantity surveyor\u2019s measure of the works done. At the end of the works, a final certificate is issued.\u00a0 After the end of the defects liability period, a further and final certificate is issued.<\/p>\n
Certificates may record certain key events and decisions under the contract.\u00a0 Confirmation and certification of those events may be preconditions to certain matters including entitlement sot payments or extensions of time.<\/p>\n
Certificates are commonly conclusive in relation to the matters certified. In other contexts, they are binding but not absolutely conclusive.\u00a0 Final certificates are generally conclusive.\u00a0 Contracts may deem certificates including in particular, the final certificate to be conclusive in certain matters.\u00a0 In other cases, certificates may be opened up and charged on adjudication, arbitration, or litigation.<\/p>\n
The fact that the certificate is conclusive in relation to substantive contents does not mean that it is unchallengeable for all purposes.\u00a0 It may not be properly issued under the contract, where for example, there are elements of fraud, improper pressure or influence.<\/p>\n
It was formerly held that in issuing certificates the contract administrator was acting in a quasi-judicial manner.\u00a0 It followed from this, that he was immune from legal suit in the same manner as an arbitrator or a \u00a0judge.\u00a0 However, the principles were overturned by the UK courts in the 1970s.\u00a0 The House of Lords held that in principle, there might be a duty of care by a certifier to the parties, in particular to the employer.<\/p>\n
Cases later departed from the principle that the contract administrator might be liable to the contractor. The English courts held that it would be unjust and unreasonable to impose a duty of care on the engineer or administrator in these circumstances.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Administrator and other Roles Building and engineering contracts of any significant scale, provide for the appointment of an architect, engineer, or other professionals to administer the contract. \u00a0In the context of building contracts, an architect usually administers the contract. \u00a0Architects are commonly appointed under standard RIAI terms of engagement.\u00a0 His obligation is not to be […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=501"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":514,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/501\/revisions\/514"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=501"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=501"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=501"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}