<\/span><\/h3>\nA person\u00a0may be found guilty of professional misconduct or unfit to practise because of physical or mental reasons may be erased, struck off or suspended by the fitness to practice committee. \u00a0The legislation allows for due process, notice and hearings together with a right of appeal, constitutional rights to fair procedures, good name and right to make a living.<\/p>\n
There are detailed regulations regarding fitness to practice allegations of misconduct.\u00a0 There is power to hold an enquiry.\u00a0 The person whose conduct is reviewed has the opportunity to be represented and made representations.<\/p>\n
The fitness to practice committee hears evidence on oath or by Affidavit. In holding the enquiry the body has powers to enforce the attendance of witnesses, examine witnesses on oath in the same manner as a judge.\u00a0 The body may have the power to strike off or enter sanctions on the conclusion of the committee investigations.<\/p>\n
It is an offence not to comply with the requirements of the committee.\u00a0 The fitness to practice committee on completion of enquiry submits to the Council a report in writing of its findings.<\/p>\n
If the committee finds an allegation is proved one or more sanctions may be imposed.\u00a0 These range from censure to fines to cancellation of registration or restriction.<\/p>\n
A decision to impose a sanction other than censure requires confirmation by Court.\u00a0 A decision to impose a sanction other than censure may be appealed to Court within 21 days.\u00a0 Where the decision is not appealed the Council must make an Application to Court for the confirmation of the decision. \u00a0The Court will confirm the decision unless it sees a good reason not to do so.<\/p>\n
2012 Act<\/p>\n
The Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Act was intended to urgently assist in addressing the current difficulty relating to Non- Consultant Hospital Doctor (NCHD) vacancies. The level of vacancies at NCHD level had significant implications for the maintenance of acute services, particularly in smaller hospitals and in certain locations where vacancies are concentrated. The reasons for the shortage of NCHDs (or junior doctors) in Irish hospitals are quite complex and include the fact that the posts in question are mainly non-training posts (and therefore not attractive to doctors) and that there is a general international shortage of junior doctors.<\/p>\n
Under the current Medical Practitioners Act 2007 (No. 25 of 2007), an applicant can seek to register in one of four divisions of the register of medical practitioners \u2014 the General Division, the Trainee Specialist Division, the Specialist Division and the Visiting EEA Practitioners Division. To be registered, an applicant must demonstrate through an examination (called the PRES) or through higher training, that they are competent to practice prior to becoming registered. Registration, if granted, is for life and a registered medical practitioner can only be removed from the register via Fitness to Practise procedures. Those registered on the General Division can take up any post including, for example, unsupervised, locum general practice positions, and may work wholly in private practice.<\/p>\n
There is an issue in regard to the registration of doctors from countries outside the European Union. In summary, many are reluctant to travel to Ireland to sit the PRES examination (which is considered to be more suitable for recent graduates and has a high failure rate) and current legislation does not provide for any type of supervised registration.<\/p>\n
This Act\u00a0 provided for the establishment of a new division of the register which will be known as the Supervised Division. Those applying to be registered in this division were to undergo a two-part assessment specific to their medical speciality and to this division. If successful, an applicant would be registered in the Supervised Division<\/p>\n
Directive Re Medical Practitioners<\/p>\n
Article 4(2)(d<\/em>) of EU Directive 2011\/24\/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March, 2011 on the application of patients\u2019 rights in cross-border health care, obliges Member States to ensure that systems of professional liability insurance, or a guarantee or similar arrangement that is equivalent or essentially comparable as regards its purpose and which is appropriate to the nature and extent of the risk, are in place for treatment provided by medical practitioners who practise medicine.<\/p>\nIn recent years various Acts have been published in the Dail and the Seanad which attempted to put in place a regulatory framework to introduce a mandatory requirement for indemnity insurance cover, but none of these progressed through the Houses of the Oireachtas.<\/p>\n
Government approved the Heads of this current Act on 21 February, 2012.<\/p>\n
<\/span>Purpose of 2017 Act<\/span><\/h3>\nThe Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Act 2017 requires that medical practitioners who are engaged in medical practice must provide evidence to the Medical Council that they hold an adequate minimum level of medical indemnity insurance. A minimum level of indemnity is \u00a0set for various classes of medical practitioners by the Medical Council, which consults with the State Claims Agency and other relevant parties in order to set these minimum levels. A medical practitioner will only require indemnity if s\/he falls within a class of medical practitioners specified as requiring indemnity.<\/p>\n
The Act should not require medical practitioners to pay any more than what would be the normal adequate indemnity cover for the medical practice in which they are engaged. If a medical practitioner is not engaged in medical practice and does not pose a risk to another person relating to his or her medical practice (e.g. a medical practitioner who is a full time lecturer) there is no legal obligation on that medical practitioner to have medical indemnity cover.<\/p>\n
\u201cIndemnity\u201d is defined as a policy of medical indemnity insurance, or other indemnity arrangement, against losses arising from claims in respect of civil liability incurred by a medical practitioner in respect of any act or omission of that medical practitioner arising from his or her practice as a medical practitioner.<\/p>\n
The <\/em>Medical Council must specify the minimum levels of indemnity which will apply to various classes of medical practitioners.<\/p>\nMedical Council may \u00a0make Rules to specify;<\/p>\n
\n- the evidence that must be submitted by the medical practitioner to the Council to satisfy the Council that the minimum level of indemnity applicable to the class of medical practitioners to which the medical practitioner belongs is in<\/li>\n
- How that evidence should be displayed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
There is a duty on the medical practitioner to ensure that s\/he has the minimum level of indemnity cover at all times when registered, appropriate to that class of medical practitioner, unless s\/he does not fall within a class that requires indemnity. A medical practitioner who contravenes \u00a0the requirement must inform the Council in writing not later than 14 days after such contravention, with particulars of what gave rise to the contravention and whether or not s\/he is still in contravention of the subsection.<\/p>\n
A medical practitioner must display at all times when registered, the evidence of minimum level of indemnity cover in the principal place where he or she practices medicine.<\/p>\n
The Medical Council to publish a notice in Iris Oifiguil setting out the minimum levels of indemnity which apply to different classes of medical practitioners, following consultation with the State Claims Agency and any other person the Council considers appropriate. The criteria for the level include awards or settlements where the claim arose out of an alleged breach of duty involving a member of that class of medical practitioners in his or her capacity as a medical practitioner who falls within that class.<\/p>\n
A medical practitioner must \u00a0provide evidence in the manner which the Council may specify in Rules, of the minimum level of indemnity which applies to his or her practice.<\/p>\n
A medical practitioner who is not engaged in medical practice and therefore who does not fall into a class of medical practitioners who must have medical indemnity, is to provide evidence that s\/he is not engaged in practice, again in accordance with Rules which may be set out by the Council.<\/p>\n
The Council cannot register a medical practitioner, who falls within a class of medical practitioner which requires indemnity, unless the medical practitioner has provided evidence of his or her minimum level of indemnity cover, as may be set out in Rules under section 11(2)(va).<\/p>\n
A visiting EEA practitioner may not practise medicine in the State unless s\/he furnishes evidence, in accordance with Medical Council rules, if any, of the minimum level of indemnity held by that medical practitioner.<\/p>\n
The Council may remove a medical practitioner from the register if he or she fails to provide evidence of the minimum level of indemnity. The Council may proceed with processing a pending complaint, if a medical practitioner was no longer registered.<\/p>\n
<\/span>Dentists<\/span><\/h3>\nA similar system of registration applies to dentists.\u00a0 A registration council maintains the register of dental surgeons.\u00a0 Persons may be admitted based on recognised qualifications and training in Ireland.\u00a0 EU qualifications are also recognised in accordance with EU legislation. A person may not practice dentistry or use titles without the requisite qualifications.<\/p>\n
Only persons entered into the register are entitled to use the description dental surgeon or dental practitioner.\u00a0 It is an offence to hold oneself out as such without being registered.\u00a0 It is an offence to practice dentistry or hold oneself out as practising dentistry without being a registered dentist.<\/p>\n
The Dental Council maintains a register of dental specialists.\u00a0 It provides registration of additional qualifications.\u00a0 The Council satisfies itself in relation to the suitability of dental education and training standards, standards of practical knowledge, standards of postgraduate education and training.\u00a0 The Council may recognise\u00a0specialities from time to time.<\/p>\n
Companies may not perform dentistry services.\u00a0 The Council may provide schemes for the establishment of auxiliary dental workers. \u00a0Similar provisions in relation to training, registration etc apply.<\/p>\n
<\/span>Enquiries<\/span><\/h3>\nThe Council has disciplinary powers in relation to misconduct and\u00a0 unfitness.\u00a0 It may suspend apply conditions, advise, admonish or censure a person.\u00a0 It may remove the dentist\u2019s name from the register.\u00a0 Most serious penalties require confirmation of the High Court.<\/p>\n
The procedure in relation to fitness to practice committees is broadly similar to that in respect of doctors.\u00a0 The fitness to practice committee initially considers whether a complaint is sufficient to warrant an enquiry.<\/p>\n
The procedures in relation to enquiries are broadly similar to that in respect of doctors.\u00a0 The committee has the powers and privileges of a High Court Judge in hearing the case.\u00a0 It is an offence for witnesses to fail to attend or co-operate.<\/p>\n
The Council following an enquiry and report by the fitness to practice committee may attach conditions, strike off, admonish. It may\u00a0 decide that the person\\’s name be erased from the register.\u00a0 The person may apply within 21 days of the decision to apply to the High Court to have the decision cancelled.<\/p>\n
The High Court may cancel the decision, declare it proper or give to the Council as the Court thinks proper.\u00a0 If the person does not apply to the High Court the Council may apply for confirmation of the decision and the Council confirms decision unless it sees a good reason to the contrary.<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/div>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Registration Doctors are regulated by the Medical Council whose functions are established by the Medical Practitioners Act, 1978 and 2007.\u00a0 The Council maintains the general register of medical practitioners. The Council also maintains registers of medical specialists. Medical practitioners may be registered in a general division, specialist division or a trainee specialist division. It is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[368],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5063"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5063"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5063\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27408,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5063\/revisions\/27408"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/legalblog.ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}